|
|
|
||||
| Coping
with a web that's no longer free A future when we pay and get our money's worth By James Kiernan It started a few years back. It was free and I was just experimenting, so there really wasn’t any harm. I really enjoyed using the internet, and it made life easier for me.
Now I’m starting to find that it’s no longer free.
Our knee-jerk reaction is to become furious at these greedy sites for taking away the content that is rightfully ours. We then come to our senses, and realize that the hard-working people behind the curtain deserve some monetary rewards for the value they add to the web. I am referring to those who update my fantasy football stats in real time; the magicians who transform choppy online video into a pleasurable viewing experience; and the analysts at WSJ.com who feed market connoisseurs the info they crave. Who's doing it right?
The categories most successful at charging for content include business
research, video-oriented programming, and the highly lucrative adult
entertainment industry.
There has to be something compelling or extremely useful behind the page
where the site separates the freeloaders from the paying customers.
Paid content is obviously a sensitive issue in the media industry. Finally the web has reached the critical mass, as 20 percent of Americans feel that the internet is the "most essential" medium in their lives, according to Arbitron/Edison Media Research data. Some may argue that placing additional price tags on web content will only aggravate the digital divide dilemma and thicken the partition between the haves and the have-nots. The government may need to offer subsidized subscriptions to schools and other public-sector organizations. Socially conscious publishers could take the first step and establish relationships with schools and public libraries.
So how is it all going to shake out? Perhaps these sites will align with one another, allowing users to pay one price for a package. Similar to the cable television model, we would still pay for our ISP, which may include some “basic” sites, with the option to buy premium channel packages. Big ISPs like AOL and MSN already have the partner relationships and user bases in place to make this happen. This is all speculation, so don’t hold me to it.
Now allow me put my selfish advertiser hat on, and let’s examine ways in
which media professionals can leverage the emergence of paid content
online. The publisher can now sell a defined audience as inventory as opposed to simple impressions. We may be looking at a holiday season where a grandmother buys her grandson a season pass to Fantasy Football Insider. There is even the scary possibility of a day where teenagers peddle yearly subscriptions to web sites to raise money for their school.
Either way, the reality is that advertising alone has failed keep a number
of sites alive and that paid content will become increasingly prevalent
in the years to come. You get what you pay for. December 6, 2002© 2002 Media Life -James Kiernan has worked in interactive media since 1998, including the past three years at Foote, Cone and Belding, where he's a media supervisor.
|
|||||