|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
For newspaper sites, charging is a bad idea Publishers would do better to register readers By Marty Beard When newspapers first began constructing web sites, they saw them as potential gold mines. But for many those gold mines have turned into black holes, with costs far exceeding ad revenues. Compounding those losses has been a rising fear among papers that print subscribers will quit paying and instead go to their web sites to get the news at no cost. In response, in an effort to boost revenues while heading off print-circulation losses, a number of papers are either switching to or at least considering charging for access to their web sites. It's probably a mistake, and most certainly a mistake in the long term. So concludes a recent report from media consultancy Borrell and Associates. The study found that print subscribers in fact do use papers' web sites in large numbers but that a very substantial share continue to read and pay for their daily print editions. Borrell found that 76 percent of readers at newspaper web sites either already subscribe to the print editions or live outside the papers’ markets. Rather than close their sites to all but paying subscribers, Borrell says papers would get a greater return by requiring readers to register and then using the data collected to make a stronger case to advertisers, in terms of the quality of their readers. Borrell also says papers can create additional revenue streams by creating premium, internet-based services, such as newsletters, and charging readers to subscribe. "Publishers think the internet is a threat rather than an opportunity. We think it’s a mixture," says Peter Krasilovsky, a partner with Borrell Associates and Arlen Communications and one of the report’s authors. "We haven’t really seen any genuine cannibalism from free internet access, but we also think it’s time for people to start adding value to their internet sites by adding additional features that are enabled by the internet." Krasilovsky says that print subscribers are inclined to use a paper's site to supplement the print version, rather than as an alternative. "People who are used to the print version of the newspaper are looking for the comprehensiveness of the print version and headlines off the internet," he says. Newspaper sites are often accessed for their archives, obituary databases and other special features that aren’t available off-line. So far, only a dozen daily papers charge for access to most of their content, but as many as 350 other newspapers are considering making the move. But Borrell raises serious doubts as to whether the papers will gain much subscription revenue as a result. People still don't like to pay for online content, and few do. On average, when papers begin charging for access, the number of online-only subscribers they attract amounts to about 2.6 percent of their print subscriber bases, Borrell found. Moreover, in a September Borrell survey, it was found that resistance to paid sites remains high. Only a quarter of users surveyed said they’d paid for online news and information in the past year. Fully 71 percent said they felt that there are so many information sources out there that it made little sense to pay for online content. Some 46 percent agreed that online news and information weren't worth paying for. Still, Borrell found, newspaper surfers are willing to register, even if they won't pay. Newspapers lose only a small percentage of readers when they begin requiring registration, and at the same time they gain data that enables them to better target ads to their online readers. Three-quarters of respondents say they’d register for access to a news site, and 60 percent said they’d freely yield at least some registration information without knowing all the details of the information required. Just 20 percent say they would stop going to a newspaper web site if it started requiring registration. And some consumers even see benefits to registration. Sixty-one percent like the idea because it can filter out advertising that doesn’t match their interests or needs; 56 percent like the idea of registering for the purposes of tailoring a site to their interests, and 49 percent would register if the site were somehow improved. Additionally, some newspapers have met with some success by charging for only parts of their web sites. For example, Belo’s Dallas Morning News has about 2,000 subscribers who pay $12.95 a year for email newsletters on topics such as pro and college sports, cooking and food, and movies. Still, before Belo began charging, it had 150,000 e-newsletter subscribers. Services like the email newsletters and premium traffic, crosswords and sports stats will help prime readers to someday pay for online subscriptions, the report says. "This is a do-or-die moment for newspapers," Krasilovsky says. "They need to establish their value now. They can’t kill their circulation by doing anything in an arbitrary manner. It’s really a matter of maintaining the value while conditioning consumers to pay for more value."
November 6, 2001 © 2001 Media Life -Marty Beard is a staff writer for Media Life.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||