 |
Broadband
access
is mostly an urban thing
Economics
favor larger, more affluent user bases
By Marty Beard
While high-speed internet
access is envisioned as a mass market phenomenon in the future, broadband
usage in 2001 remains a niche activity.
It is also a form of media consumption with a pronounced
geographic limitation to date.
In fact, 30 percent of all broadband users live in just five
metropolitan areas--New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston and
Seattle--according to new figures for the month of April from
Nielsen//NetRatings.
Fully 10 percent of all broadband users can be found in
the New York City area alone. Another 6 percent are in Los Angeles.
At first glance, such usage patterns may seem
surprising. But the sheer size of the populations of New York and Los
Angeles work in their favor, along with New York’s high percentage of
apartment dwellers. Broadband providers have found it easier to target
more customers by wiring apartments than single family suburban houses.
In general, the spread of broadband is mirroring the spread
of other media before it, according to T.S. Kelly, NetRatings’ director
of internet media strategies.
"We look at what’s going on with broadband and see
that it is developing very much like the internet did in the mid and late
’90s, where it focused on targeting the early adopters," says
Kelly.
As of April some 15 percent of all active internet
users accessed the web with a high-speed connection, according to
Nielsen//NetRatings. In numbers this added up to nearly 16 million
internet users going online via cable modem, DSL, ISDN and LAN
connections.
This figure is up from 6.8 million in April 2000—an
increase of 134 percent over the past year.
But Kelly says that three factors could limit broadband
growth in the near future.
First, the price point is still a bit higher than most
consumers can afford. High-speed internet access via cable modem typically
costs around $45 a month, and DSL connections can cost that or more.
"Consumers spend X amount on cable and X amount on so
many other things," Kelly says. "Do they have enough money left
over to purchase broadband, if it’s $30, $40 a month or even more?"
Second, high-speed internet access is not widely available
yet. And in places where it is available, Kelly says, it is often
unreliable, with poor customer service.
He notes that this parallels the spread of cable TV in
the late 1970s and early 1980s.
"Look at how cable developed in the late ’70s
and early ’80s," Kelly says. "You saw people stringing up
cable wire on telephone poles across the country.
"But then your neighbors
or people down the street had it, but you didn’t, and you wanted it. You
might have gotten it, but there might have been poor service, dropouts.
"Cable customer service went through growing pains and
has finally reached a point where they’re satisfying customer needs
better than ever," he adds.
The third factor that could limit the spread of broadband is
the content itself. Specifically, Kelly says, broadband needs some form of
programming that is so new and compelling that people will actually want
it badly enough to line up for it.
"Broadband content needs to evolve," Kelly
says. "Where is the killer app, that ‘I want my MTV’-like killer
app that drives consumption, that drives people to say that they want
their broadband?"
Napster, he says, was a contender for the killer-app crown,
but copyright and other legal issues changed that.
For now, according to Kelly, broadband access remains
the province of early adopters.
That will change as more and more consumers upgrade. Broadband
access is spreading at what he deems a healthy clip, and there should be
about 20 million users by the end of this year.
"Internet penetration is up to 70 percent in some
markets, such as Seattle and Portland," Kelly says. "We’ve
seen internet growth in those markets begin to slow because we’ve
reached a certain threshold of users, so we’re now in single-digit
growth.
"The same markets where internet access has slowed
are the same markets where broadband is beginning to take hold."
|
Broadband Users by Local Market
Area
April 2001
|
|
Local market area |
Percent of broadband users |
|
1. New York |
10.2 |
|
2. Los Angeles |
5.9 |
|
3. San Francisco |
5.8 |
|
4. Boston |
4.7 |
|
5. Seattle |
3.6 |
|
6. Dallas |
3.5 |
|
7. Chicago |
3.1 |
|
8. Philadelphia |
2.9 |
|
9. San Diego |
2.7 |
|
10. Detroit |
2.4 |
Source:
Nielsen//NetRatings
|
May 16, 2001 © 2001 Media Life
-Marty
Beard is a staff writer for Media Life.

Printer-Friendly
Version | Send
to a Friend
Cover Page | Contact
Us
|
|
 |