 |
Large
players slow
to advertise on web
Small companies
still lead in ad impressions
By Jeremy Schlosberg
Despite the acceptance
of the web as a communications and information medium by an increasingly
mainstream audience, the country’s biggest non-dot.com advertisers are
keeping the web at arm’s length.
Divide the
companies advertising on the web into three groups—small, medium and
large—and it’s the small companies that continue to place the biggest
number of impressions online, according to a new report from AdRelevance.
The median number
of ad impressions purchased during the fourth quarter of 2000 by small
companies was 167 million, ahead of the 160 million purchased by midsize
companies and the 135 million purchased by large companies.
To ad-supported web
sites in financial trouble, this reality comes as salt in the wound of
their current revenue woes.
"When the
bottom fell out of the dot.com market last spring, there were a number of
analysts who felt sure that the larger companies were going to rush in to
fill in the gap," says Charles Buchwalter, vice president of media
research for AdRelevance, which is owned by internet measurement and
analysis firm Jupiter Media Metrix.
But
the big companies aren’t rushing anywhere.
"While more
large companies are extending their market portfolios to include online, a
number of them are still somewhat on the sidelines," says Buchwalter.
That’s not to say they
won’t end up spending a lot on new media. One good sign for ad-starved
web sites is that when large companies do advertise online, they tend to
spend far more per web site than smaller companies.
In the fourth
quarter of 2000, the media ad spend per site by large companies was
$56,000, compared to $26,000 for small companies and $17,000 for midsize
companies, according to AdRelevance.
Plus, large
companies already tend to buy a wider range of sites than smaller
companies. The median number of sites purchased in the fourth quarter of
2000 by large companies was 72, compared to 57 for small companies and 50
for midsize companies.
So large companies
are out there but they’re holding back. They see no need to hurry. The
current environment has proven to them once and for all that the idea that
businesses have to think and respond in so-called internet time was an
illusion.
"I think what you
have now are these larger companies—companies that have built brands
offline—asking themselves the question, ‘Okay, do I believe it’s
possible to build brands in the online world?’" says Buchwalter.
"And more and more are seeing evidence that it makes sense to do
this. But they’re in the process of figuring out what part of their
portfolio should go to the web."
A small company as
defined by AdRelevance is a company with quarterly sales of $75 million or
less. Midsize companies are defined as companies with quarterly sales
between $75 million and $500 million, while large companies have quarterly
sales above $500 million.
When the data is further
dissected, one group in particular emerges as by far the most active type
of web advertiser—the midsize dot.com.
During the fourth
quarter of 2000, the median number of impressions purchased by midsize
dot.coms was 453 million.
This number was
well over double the median number of impressions purchased by the second
most active group of advertisers, the small dot.coms (see chart).
All sizes of dot.coms
were more active online advertisers than any size traditional company.
Among traditional
companies, the largest rather than the smallest are the most active
online.
"It’s always the large companies that set the standard
of trying new things," says Buchwalter. "So when you see more
small to medium companies that are traditional getting into the fray, then
that will be more of an indication that there’s some wind behind the
sail."
|
MEDIAN AD IMPRESSIONS PURCHASED
Fourth
Quarter 2000, in Millions
|
|
Midsize dot.coms |
453 |
|
Small dot.coms |
176 |
|
Large dot.coms |
140 |
|
Large traditional companies |
135 |
|
Small traditional companies |
127 |
|
Midsize traditional companies |
117 |
Source:
AdRelevance
|
-Jeremy
Schlosberg is the senior editor for new media.

Printer-Friendly
Version | Send
to a Friend
Cover Page | Contact
Us
© 2001 Media Life |
|
 |