|
|||||
| Plastic's
Anuff on the value of cheap Post-shakeout sensibility on making it online by Marty Beard Last week, Automatic Media launched Plastic.com, a community site heralded as the Slashdot of pop culture. Slashdot.org, a news site for techies, is often trumpeted as the model community site. Its readers generate all the content through online discussions of all manner of technology issues. Plastic readers discuss issues such as sex, music, humor and TV. Plastic links to content from Automatic Media units Feed, Suck, and Alt.Culture. Other partners include Modern Humorist, Wired News, Spin, Inside.com, Nerve, The New Republic, Movieline, Gamers.com, NetSlaves and TeeVee.org. Automatic Media was formed last year with the merger of comic strip-like site Suck, thinkzine Feed Magazine and pop culture glossary Alt.Culture. It remains unclear if the Slashdot approach will translate successfully to pop culture; its relatively complex interface scheme may or may not catch on with a non-tech crowd. Media Life spoke with Plastic editor in chief Joey Anuff three days after the site launched. Newsweek named Anuff, a co-founder of Suck, one of the "50 People Who Matter Most on the internet." He has written for Salon, Spin, Time Digital, Wired and other magazines, and has written two books about the internet and the new economy.
Given the much-ballyhooed bad climate for dot.coms, this venture might appear to some to be suicidal, or at least questionably timed. What’s your response to such pronouncements? If launching a site like Plastic is a bad idea
in this economy, there’s no excuse to launch any other sites any
time.
Your Automatic Media colleague Steven Johnson just wrote an article in Feed comparing the Plastic model to AmIHotOrNot.com. A minimum of effort on the part of the site’s founders goes into it, since all content comes from users. It’s already turning a profit from ads. I don’t think I’ve seen that yet. It’s
not a bad comparison, although I’m not sure it’s the best one. Maybe
AmIGothOrNot is a better one. Or AmIGodOrNot. Online community sites haven't been faring well. One recent example is Sixdegrees.com, the Silicon Alley-based Gen Y community site that folded in December. Is this Slashdot model the way to make online communities financially viable? I had never put much stock in straight
community sites until Slashdot. But Slashdot has been so much more
successful in terms of traffic than many others in the category. Slashdot
is definitely one of the most significant content sites to come out of the
web.
What are the implications here for the future of pure-play internet companies? Should existing dot.coms consider adopting—or adapting—this model? It’s hard to know what the implications are,
but the reality for content companies online always has been that they
should keep their budgets under control.
Who's advertising, what sorts of advertisers in general do you anticipate attracting, and how will you entice advertisers, given the current environment? You’ll find the same kind of advertisers on
Plastic as you would on media properties like Spin, Wired News, Gamers and
Movieline.
Who will visit Plastic and why? The same audience that visits all of the Automatic
Media sites is likely to contribute editorially to Plastic. Why will they visit Plastic? No matter how great the editorial quality is of any magazine, a media outlet is never better informed or smarter than the communal intelligence of its users and readers. I’m never going to know what the coolest site is or the coolest band is or what the best film is more than 100,000 other people working together to root them out. They’re going to find them, they will find them. -Marty Beard is a staff writer for Media Life.
© 2001 Media Life |
|||||