 |
National
Geo Channel:
What ad chill? We're cool.
Advertising
will spring forth when budgets loosen
By Gabriel Spitzer
A year ago, when the ad market was tres hot, nothing was quite so
hot as the much-talked-about launch of the National Geographic
Channel.
Then came the big chill. The channel launched last
month in a much different climate, and with a lot less oomph than many had
expected.
But that hasn't damped spirits all that much at the network.
"We’re pacing ahead of every goal we had from a
revenue point of view. In terms of absolute revenue, CPMs, any benchmark
we can think of, we’re pacing ahead," says Rich Goldfarb, senior
vice president of sales at the National Geographic Channel.
As an untested entity in
a category crowded by the Discovery Channel and its offspring, the network
is relying on a brand that has become part of America’s cultural
landscape to see it through the tough times.
National Geographic
Channel launched on Jan. 7 with 10 million initial subscribers, with
commitments for 18 million more over the next few years.
NGC is now carried on DirecTV, which accounts for
the majority of the channel’s current subscriber base, plus AT&T,
Adelphia and National Cable Television Cooperative. It is on cable in only
a few major markets, including San Francisco and Los Angeles.
The relatively low penetration is surely working as an impediment to
ad sales, especially since the downturn in the ad market of a few months
back.
Still, Goldfarb
maintains that there is no shortage of advertisers.
"There are
always going to be some who, for whatever reason, will say, ‘Okay, we’ll
wait until every single thing is as perfect as it can possibly be.’ Then
one of two things happens: either they never get in, or at least into the
shows they want, or they have to pay a price they don’t want to
pay," says Goldfarb.
"The greatest barrier
that has been holding people back so far has been simply that they don’t
have the funds right now to commit to the channel, and as soon as they do
they will."
The network has
deals in place with a number of major national advertisers, most of which
include time on all of NGC’s original programs. The list includes a
heavy dose of automotive companies like Ford, Toyota, Nissan and Subaru,
financial-services companies such as State Farm and New York Life, as well
as a smattering of other familiar names like Johnson & Johnson.
The network is
trying to lure advertisers into cross-platform packages that span the
network, international television (the company has been operating networks
outside the U.S. for several years) and the National Geographic magazines.
Ford has
signed on for such a package, and Toyota bought a global TV deal. Goldfarb
hopes that when broadcast upfronts come along this spring, more big media
deals will follow.
"It made
sense to launch in January, but that meant that we couldn’t take
advantage of broadcast upfronts. The next opportunity for significant
volume will be in the upfronts," says Goldfarb.
The network also expects
more advertisers to jump onboard as cable companies across the nation
begin to pick up the channel.
A
spokesman for NGC says all the major MSOs have shown interest in picking
up the channel and that only the terms of the deals are in question.
National
Geographic Channel’s monthly subscription fee is a tad steep at 15 cents
per subscriber, and some observers suspect that the price tag is what has
kept some of the top cable companies like Time Warner and Cablevision from
striking early deals.
NGC is not yet
rated by Nielsen, and no informal audience numbers are yet available for
the network. But NGC’s competitors continued to do well last month: The
Discovery Channel was up 8 percent in households over January of 2000, the
Learning Channel was up 10 percent and the Travel Channel was up 150
percent.
That success cuts
both ways; it means that there is plenty of interest in the sort of
programming that NGC offers, but it might also mean that NGC has been
unable in its first month to take many viewers away from its rivals.
But considering
the adverse conditions, National Geographic and Fox, which owns two thirds
of the network, are pleased with the launch and with the channel’s
potential for growth.
"Our
advertisers have gravitated to this channel in a weak market for a reason.
They’re taking advantage from the start and building an automatic
incumbency," says Goldfarb.
"Everyone
recognizes that 10 million homes at launch is just that—at launch. We
will grow significantly and everybody knows that."
-Gabriel Spitzer is a staff writer for Media Life.

Send to a
Friend| Printer-Friendly Version
Cover Page | Contact
Us
© 2001 Media Life |
|
 |