 |
If
you want reality,
turn on the music
'Bands on the
Run' and
'Making the Band' perfect the genre
By Andrew Wallenstein
Coming
off a week where a new game show like NBC's "Weakest Link"
and a new voyeuristic dating show like UPN's "Chains of Love"
are both lumped together under the banner of "reality TV," some
re-evaluation is in order.
As this so-called genre keeps burgeoning, so
does the need to make sense of its diversity.
Take the genre's flagship, CBS's "Survivor,"
for example. Has it struck anyone as strange that we refer to a series in
which a group of people voluntarily strand themselves on a deserted island
as a "reality" series?
Same goes for Fox's "Boot
Camp," which trains contestants on a military base, though they will
never be drafted.
"Surreal TV" would be a better label for these
shows.
If anyone could lay claim to approximating true
reality, it's the genre's music-themed offshoots. In shows like the WB's
"Popstars," a group of performers get groomed for actual
stardom. Their careers don't end when the series does.
That's also true of "Making the Band" (Fridays, 8-8:30 p.m. ET),
which ABC brought back for a second season on April 13, and VH1's
"Bands on the Run" (Sundays, 10-11 p.m.), which premiered April
1.
But the appeal of these shows isn't just about being
firmly rooted in reality. There's something endlessly fascinating about
exploring the group dynamic of a musical band, which any viewer of VH1's
"Behind the Music" can confirm.
But even at their inception, bands are
fascinating as they deal with the clashing concerns of art and commerce,
not to mention groupie-stoked egos.
VH1's "Run" and ABC's "Making" may
seem like totally different shows, but they cover the same ground, only
coming from different directions.
"Run" funds four up-and-coming rock bands as they travel
from city to city seeking publicity and getting gigs. Each week they
compete to see who can earn the most money from merchandise and ticket
sales; the winning band will get its big break on VH1.
But as intense as the pressure is to win, there's still
plenty of time for sloth and decadence, which rockers can't help but
indulge in.
Each episode seems to feature somebody getting drunk and acting
like a moron, which is a welcome contrast to the ridiculously
hyper-competitive and humorless likes of "Boot" and
"Survivor."
My favorite band of the four to watch is Flickerstick,
five guys who can't seem to dislike one another more. Cory the guitarist is
an egomaniac who resents Brandon, the lead singer, for his artistic
pretensions. Rex, the other guitarist, resents Brandon because "I'm
the guy they added on to make Brandon a rock star so he doesn't have to
play guitar anymore." Everyone in the band resents Dominic the
drummer because he's a boozy skirt-chaser who can be downright annoying.
And yet for all their incredible dysfunctionality, they
have a passion for their craft that makes them worth rooting for. They're
certainly more interesting to watch than the all-girl goth group Harlow,
whose chumminess with each other turns out to be a liability because none
of them want to step up and boss each other around.
They're slow to learn
what the other bands seem to know intuitively: bands cannot operate as
democracies. Usually one not-so-benevolent dictator has to take the reins
and crack the whip.
Pressed to put money on the group to win, my dollar
would go to Soulcracker, a genial group of guys who are quite bland but
totally committed to spreading the word about their band.
Their tireless
efforts to promote and perform whenever possible also point up the
paradox of rock stardom: a lot of drudgery goes into generating glamour.
But no such paradox exists for the apple-cheeked
quintet called O-Town on "Making." They were hand-picked by Lou
Pearlman, the mind behind the Backstreet Boys and *NSync. Whereas
"Run" depicts bands scrambling to achieve fame, on
"Making," "We were famous before we even had a band,"
one of them says.
Still, even instant fame has its burdens, namely, the impetus
to display the talent that makes them deserving of their status. While
season one focused on putting the band together, season two follows their
search for respect after some minor success (their album reached the
Billboard charts after they signed a record deal with J Records).
What's most compelling about "Making"
is a different kind of paradox than the one on display in "Run":
How you can make a warts-and-all reality show about a boy band, a teenage
fantasy marketed with the precision of a presidential campaign? Even a
10-year-old can see "Making" is impossibly squeaky clean,
presenting the pinups offstage just as endearingly as they are in music
videos or concerts.
Still, "Making" is a great opportunity to
watch manufactured hype from the inside out, kind of like taking in a
hurricane while calmly floating in its eye. The legions of screeching
girls who turn up everywhere O-Town makes a public appearance can't be
faked, which makes even a prepackaged product more "real" than a
million-dollar-winning castaway.
April 23, 2001 © 2001 Media Life
-Andrew Wallenstein is the television
critic for Media Life.

Send to a
Friend| Printer-Friendly Version
Cover Page | Contact
Us
|
|
 |