'The
web won't kill papers,
quite the opposite'
Opportunity to build on the public's trust
By Jeremy Schlosberg
chatting with Bernadette Tracy
Last week, Bernadette Tracy shared some
insights on the complex relationship between television and the web. The
last traditional medium she will examine for us as far as its relationship
to the internet goes is the newspaper.
Lots of new media people have long assumed that the
newspaper will have no place in a future dominated by the internet. How
are newspapers doing in their online incarnations?
They’re actually doing pretty well. My research
shows that 51 percent of the current online population visit newspaper
sites regularly. This breaks down into 53 percent of all online men and 49
percent of all online women.
How about in terms of age? Are younger people less
interested in newspapers, as is often presumed?
Not necessarily. Regular visitors to newspaper
sites include 52 percent of the online population aged 35 and up but also
49 percent of the online population that’s under 35.
And going to
newspaper sites online seems to be something that people grow into online.
While 43 percent of newbies—that is, people who have come online in the
last year—regularly visit newspaper sites, this goes up to 55 percent of
people I call "pacesetters," or those online for three or more
years.
So this points to a growing audience. By 2002, newspaper sites
should have a significantly larger audience than they already do now.
What kinds of newspapers are online users heading
towards?
They’re going to both local and national
newspapers. Seventy-eight percent of regular visitors to newspaper sites
go to local newspaper sites, 70 percent go to national and 48 percent go
to both. People who go online regularly are real news hounds.
And they basically like newspaper sites for their
news?
Yes. It’s quite a competitive advantage
newspapers have over television stations on the web. Because only 34
percent of online users say that they regularly visit TV news sites.
So
people going online for news coverage are much more likely to be looking
for the kind of in-depth coverage that they associate already with
newspapers in print—as opposed to more of the top-line, breaking news
coverage that are associated with TV news coverage, and by extension with
TV news sites.
Do you think this is because the web is still
largely a text-based medium, and traditional newspapers are also,
obviously, text-based?
No. I think it’s a perception. If someone really
really wants to dig into a story, get the full details behind something,
where are they going to think to go online, a newspaper site or a TV site?
I think if people are looking for full coverage, they believe they’re
more likely to find it on a newspaper site than a TV site. I’m not
saying this is accurate but it’s the perception.
If people are going online to read newspapers, where
does that leave the print newspaper?
Well, that’s the big question, isn’t it?
But
it turns out that we’re not seeing really significant attrition, and it’s
not getting any worse.
According to my research, 18 percent of the entire
online population says they are reading fewer print newspapers as a result
of being online. This breaks down to 21 percent of all online men, 15
percent of all online women.
Happily for the newspaper industry, there has
been no significant change in these numbers for the last three years. And
there’s not a big difference here between new users and more experienced
users—18 percent of newbies say they are reading fewer newspapers now,
and 20 percent of pacesetters.
Simply put, the newspapers are not going to go out
of business.
I don’t think newspapers should be overly concerned about attrition. I
think what they need to do is devote their full attention to the internet
as an extension of the already positive perception the public has of them
in terms of trust and interest.
So we see that newspaper sites are pretty popular.
What are people doing there?
First and foremost, they want local news—that’s
what 80 percent of regular visitors to newspaper sites go there for. Next
comes weather, which is what 70 percent of them go there for. National
news is next, with 69 percent, then sports at 46 percent and general
merchandise, 41 percent.
What does this mean exactly, "general
merchandise"?
This is actually a very important category for the
newspapers. It means that one of the reasons people go to newspaper sites
is to get, essentially, general information about stuff they’re
interested in.
They’re not only looking for information about specific
products, they’re also hoping the newspaper will provide them with
additional information about an entire product category, including tips
about purchasing whatever it happens to be. I see this as a real
opportunity for newspapers to do some innovative, niche marketing online.
This is especially true for complex product
categories, which could be anything from a new sound system to remodeling
your house to buying insurance.
After general merchandise, 34 percent of newspaper
site visitors are looking for automotive information, and 32 percent go
specifically to find a local store that will sell them what they’re
looking to buy.
Right there I see a great opportunity to sell online
advertising to local retailers, especially advertising aimed at women,
since 37 percent of women go to newspaper sites for this reason, as
opposed to 28 percent of men.
Twenty-seven percent of newspaper site visitors go
for real estate listings and information, and 20 percent go for stock
quotes. This last figure tells me that the newspapers are no longer the
primary source for stock quotes.
Obviously this is information that people can get
elsewhere online, in a more timely and updated way.
And it fits in to what newspaper site visitors are
looking for in general, which is in-depth information, analysis and
recommendations. Newspapers don’t have to be the place people get stock
quotes anymore.
Do newspaper work well for driving people to other
places on the web?
Well, first of all we found that 38 percent of
people online say they notice advertising on newspaper sites, compared to
overall web advertising, which is noticed by 26 percent of everyone
online.
But the real whopper here is that 54 percent say they are likely
to visit an advertiser’s web site based on content, advertising or
hyperlinks on a newspaper web sites. This is a big opportunity for
newspapers. Ads are getting noticed and they’re working.
Is there anything that’s not going well for
newspapers online?
Here’s one thing in the bad news column: 40
percent of the current online population says that they have used the
internet as an alternative to traditional classifieds. Breaking this down,
16 percent have used online classifieds for general merchandise, 11
percent for employment, 10 percent for automotive, 3 percent for real
estate.
So if you take this category by category it’s not at this moment
a major threat. But it’s something that newspapers should pay very close
attention to.
Having said that I like to point out that the
Chinese word for crisis is a combination of the characters for
"threat" and "opportunity."
So while many people in
the newspaper business are seeing the internet as a crisis, they should
spend less time on the threat part and focus more time on the
unprecedented opportunity it offers.
Such as?
Well, I think the coming wireless explosion offers
a lot for newspapers. My research shows that 56 percent of newspaper web
site visitors already have wireless devices of some sort, but only 5
percent are so far using any of these devices—whether they’re cell
phones, beepers or Palm Pilots—to access the internet.
We forecast that
by the end of this year this is going to explode. Wireless is going to
become universal a lot faster than the internet did. Because they already
own the device. So we’re not going to see the same sort of learning
curve that we had on the internet. And because these people are proven
multi-taskers—they’re very familiar with the internet, and they’re
very familiar and comfortable with their wireless devices.
Newspaper sites
are in a good position to anticipate and market to this burgeoning
audience. You can’t fold up a newspaper web site and read it while you’re
hanging on a subway strap, but you can read The Wall Street Journal on
your Palm Pilot on a train, and more and more people will be doing this.
It’s one thing to talk about the potential
newspaper sites have and their popularity with users, but it’s still
true that a site can be widely used and still bleed money, such as The
Washington Post’s web site. How does this happen? And can we know there’s
a workable business model here?
Definitely there’s a business model. The thing
is, newspapers are still living in the old economy where you had value as
a basis for an investment and then you had a very short-term pay-out
period.
The new economy has totally flip-flopped our investment mentality. And
what the newspaper web sites have to realize is that there is a new
business model now with a very long-term pay-out period compared to what
they’re used to.
I’d like for you to name for me an internet stock
that is now showing a profit. And if you did I would definitely not invest
in it because it would tell me they have the wrong model.
What we’re
dealing with is that newspaper companies have to look at the internet as a
totally new business. They have to think of their web site as a start-up
company--a startup company with a lot of inherent trust and built-in
relationships to customers it’s true. But they can’t expect to turn
that into a profit overnight. It’s a building process, it’s a
marketing process. A lot of it has to do with educating the advertisers.
To do this you have to hire a separate sales staff. It’s basically a
whole new way of thinking.
To quote the great Wayne Gretzky, when asked about
his success, he said: "It’s not only important to know where the
puck is but to know where the puck is going, and to be there when it gets
there." Look, if newspapers do not completely destroy their existing
mindset and business model, somebody else is going to do it for them.
Right now very few if any newspapers that I’m
aware of are really aggressively pursuing this. A few that I can mention
that I do feel quote-unquote "get it" are The Wall Street
Journal, the Chicago Tribune, and oddly enough the Portland Oregonian.
An important thing to note is that newspapers,
unlike some of their online competitors such as the portals, are fighting
the limited online advertising budgets of their traditional
advertisers.
Whereas the portals are picking up tons and tons of what I call funny
money, because there’s no accountability for it—funny money from the
dot.coms. Newspapers aren’t getting this money, either online or
offline.
And I don’t think the newspapers have the glitz that even TV
offers the dot.coms. So for the dot.coms they’re a complete
afterthought. But I think if they tend to their knitting and market to the
kinds of advertisers they already have, they’ll end up just fine. But
make no mistake, it’s going to take a whole lot of effort.
-Jeremy
Schlosberg is the senior editor for new media.
-Bernadette Tracy, a
respected authority on the internet, is founder and president of
NetSmartAmerica.com (http://www.netsmartamerica.com) an online consumer motivational research firm that
specializes in spotting emerging trends. She appears every Friday in the
pages of Media Life.

Cover Page | Contact Us
|