 |
Studies
show cable matches
broadcast in viewer ad recall
But at least one top researcher has doubts
By Dave Lindorff
Conventional wisdom
has it that recall of ads appearing on cable is lower than on networks,
but two studies, one to be released today, contend cable recall is nearly
equal or higher.
A study being
released this morning by the Cabletelevision Advertising Bureau found that
12.4 percent of ad-supported cable viewers contacted could recall at least
one ad from the most recent advertising pod they had watched. The study
was conducted in February during primetime by Nielsen Media
Research.
This result is
only marginally--3.9 percent--lower than the 12.9 percent of broadcast
viewers who could recall one recent ad they'd seen.
A study presented at last summer's Advertising Research
Foundation by Initiative Media actually showed cable to be superior to
broadcast in ad recall.
Examining ad recall a
day after viewing, the Initiative Media study asked viewers what
percentage of ads they had seen the prior day captured "most of their
attention" and which had captured their "full attention."
Researchers found that 8 percent for the first measure and 6 percent
for the second.
That compared to only 5 percent devoting most of their
attention and 4 percent devoting all their attention to broadcast
advertising.
That works out to cable
viewers being 50 percent more attentive to ads than broadcast viewers.
The cable
industry is trumpeting the CAB study at today's Cable Advertising
Conference in New York, where the research is being presented by Jonathan
Sims, vice president for research at the CAB.
"This study
provides quantifiable proof that, contrary to some generally-held
assumptions, ad-supported cable viewers do not automatically zap through
the multichannel spectrum to circumvent commercials," says CAB
president and chief executive officer Joe Ostrow. "They're as
attentive to commercial messages as broadcast audiences."
The CAB has
promised to release the full study and data to interested ad agencies,
which will be able to conduct their own analyses.
The study involved phone
interviews of 5,800 television viewers, and results were checked against
Nielsen's Monitor Plus commercial logs. Only national advertisements were
counted, not local ads, which aren't monitored by Monitor Plus.
The CAB study also found
that the same percentage of cable and broadcast viewers were watching
television at the commercial break: 62.2 percent for cable viewers and
63.1 percent for broadcast network viewers.
But not everyone thinks the CAB research holds up.
Erwin Ephron, the respected media researcher, is known for disputing
conventional wisdoms, but in the matter of ad recall he's decidedly
old-school.
"I'm surprised by
the results," says leading media researcher Erwin Ephron, of Ephron
Papazian & Ephron, "and I still think broadcast advertising has
better recall. You have to watch out when rabbits carry the lettuce."
|
CAB Recall Study
|
|
Watching TV |
Not
watching TV |
|
Total |
|
4286 |
1406 |
|
5792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watching at last commercial
break |
|
Source |
Total viewers |
Watching at break |
Percent |
|
Ad-supported cable |
1259 |
753 |
62.2 |
|
Broadcast networks |
2391 |
1508 |
63.1 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Recall of at least one
commercial |
|
Source |
Watching at break |
Correct recall |
Percent |
|
Ad-supported cable |
783 |
97 |
12.4 |
|
Broadcast networks |
1508 |
194 |
12.9 |
|
Data courtesy Cabletelevision
Advertising Bureau
|

Cover Page | Contact Us
|
 |