New media
   

Media Life
Homepage


When finding work's
like finding love


At Climber, the aim is building lasting relationships

Jul 31, 2007

At first glance, work and romance would seem to be at the opposite ends of life. But they're not really all that far apart.

We look for certain things in a mate and we also look for certain things in a job, and often they're the same things: a sense of being wanted and appreciated, a potential for personal growth, the sharing of experience.

Which brings us to Climber.com, a recruitment web site that treats the job hunting experience as, in a sense, a search for love. Its motto: Dating for jobs.

Climber.com seems to have come upon something. Founded only in April, the site reached 1.13 million unique visitors by June, and it now ranks at No. 10 on the Nielsen//Net Ratings list of the top 10 career development sites.

In the exploding area of online classifieds, recruitment is among the fastest-growing, and as that growth mushrooms, there are the huge general sites, such as Monster.com, but also an increasing number of job sites that either serve very specific fields or offer a unique, almost boutique, approach to finding a job.

Job matching is a hot growth area these days.

Climber.com is one of a dozen career development web sites offering recruitment matching, including TheJobNetwork.com, founded in 2000. Even industry leader CareerBuilder.com, Nielsen’s No. 1 career site in June with 16.1 million unique visitors, has added a candidate matching and screening site called RightFish.com.

For Climber.com's founder and CEO, Mike O’Brien, the model was the dating site eHarmony, because of its very personal approach to bringing love interests together.

His aim is to do the same with worker and employer. It's about building long-term relationships. Says O'Brien: “People visit when they want to find a life partner."

The result, argues O'Brien, is more productive employees and happier employers.

That comes about by pairing job seekers with employers based on shared values.

In the interview process, one similar to that of eHarmony's compatibility test, job seekers are asked to rank the importance of such things as pay raises and stock options as compared with social responsibility and career/life balance. The quiz is actually a computer algorithm that creates what Climber calls a career fingerprint. Companies are quizzed on their company DNA.

Matching sites also offer an additional value: anonymity. That comes in handy for people who are not actively looking but are open to hearing about new work opportunities. An interested employer can send a query to that person, and if there's any interest, the person can respond. Only then is the prospective employee's identity revealed.

"Unless you’re doing matching, you’re not really in web 2.0. Otherwise you’re just doing a text search," says Job Network CEO Marc Wilson. Wilson compares recruitment sites that don't offer matching to blind dates, and he says, “Blind dates are a waste of time.”

More sites like Climber.com and Job Network can be expected to emerge with the ongoing shift of employment ads from newspapers to the internet. Last month the number of help-wanted ads in U.S. newspapers fell to their lowest level since 1958, according to the Conference Board. Morgan Stanley Research estimates the internet recruiting industry will generate more than $2.4 billion in 2007.

Meanwhile, in online ratings for the week ended July 22, the top five parent companies were Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Time Warner and News Corp. Online for the 25th straight week. The top five brands were Google, Yahoo, MSN/Windows Live, AOL Media Network and Microsoft for the 14th straight week.

Low Rate Source was the top advertiser with 5.88 million impressions, followed by No. 2 NexTag at 5.38 million. With 30.57 million ads served, Yahoo was again the top advertising site, well ahead of No. 2 MySpace at 5.49 million.

Sessions per person per week were even to last week at 16, with domains visited per person also up one to 40. Average PC time per person per week was down 1.45 percent to 16 hours and 58 minutes.

 

Top 25 parent companies
Through July 22

#

Parent

Unique Audience (000)

 Reach %

Time Spent per Person (hh:mm:ss)

1

Microsoft

83,216

61.2

0:43:01

2

Google

79,808

58.7

0:32:16

3

Yahoo!

73,833

54.3

1:03:10

4

Time Warner

68,371

50.3

1:28:11

5

News Corp. Online

42,612

31.3

1:03:52

6

eBay

35,210

25.9

0:45:44

7

InterActiveCorp

28,298

20.8

0:11:58

8

Amazon

21,687

15.9

0:15:48

9

Landmark Communications

20,929

15.4

0:24:00

10

Apple Computer

20,685

15.2

0:32:21

11

RealNetworks, Inc.

18,805

13.8

0:18:58

12

New York Times Company

18,703

13.8

0:09:20

13

Wikimedia Foundation

18,674

13.7

0:09:51

14

Walt Disney Internet Group

18,127

13.3

0:16:54

15

AT&T Inc.

17,000

12.5

0:22:09

16

Bank of America

13,490

9.9

0:19:24

17

United Online

13,040

9.6

0:24:07

18

Viacom Digital

11,668

8.6

0:26:57

19

Comcast Corp.

11,157

8.2

0:28:31

20

CNET Networks

11,125

8.2

0:06:32

21

E.W. Scripps Company

10,883

8.0

0:06:03

22

Verizon Communications

10,595

7.8

0:16:50

23

CBS Corporation

10,359

7.6

0:12:26

24

Facebook

9,976

7.3

0:34:53

25

Gannett

9,885

7.3

0:10:02

Source: Nielsen//NetRatings

 

Top 25 brands
Through July 22

 

Parent

Unique Audience (000)

Reach %

Time spent per person (hh:mm:ss)

1

Google

74,699

54.9

0:23:33

2

Yahoo!

73,055

53.7

1:03:31

3

MSN/Windows Live

65,569

48.2

0:42:10

4

AOL Media Network

56,459

41.5

1:38:10

5

Microsoft

52,055

38.3

0:15:34

6

Fox Interactive Media

36,826

27.1

1:10:00

7

eBay

30,671